REVIEW: “The Lion King”; It’s Déjà Vu All Over Again!

This post may contain affiliate links; please read the disclosure for more information.

To make a long review short, literally, this movie stinks. Just watch the original animated movie, which is perfect in every way.

Rule #1 when doing a remake of a movie. It sure as hell should be better than the original, and if not, don’t waste your time, and don’t waste our time. And with that, The Lion King is the latest victim of Disney converting their animated classics into lackluster live action versions.

Jon Favreau directed both The Jungle Book and The Lion King. The Jungle Book is a prime example where a remake worked. It paid homage to the original, but also added some new story lines that made it more interesting and fun. Favreau played it kind of safe with his adaptation of The Lion King, and it didn’t work this time.

And you have to get the villain right. Shere Khan was outright terrifying in Jungle Book and perfectly voiced by Idris Elba. Scar just looked old, skinny and ready to die at any moment in this version of The Lion King. Granted, Scar is no Mufasa, but he is no pussycat, either. Chiwetel Ejiofor did a good job voicing the character, but was nowhere as villainous and threatening as his animated counterpart. Which one (above) is truly scarier? By the way, it would have been nice if they cast Idris Elba for something in this movie.

I will say that at times, this version of The Lion King looks absolutely stunning and completely life-like. Some of the animals look a little funky, like the elephants, but they sure got Mufasa right. Remember how Aslan looked in The Chronicles Of Narnia? We have come a long way. And it is so hard to believe that everything on screen was made in the digital realm and not filmed somewhere on the plains in the African savanna.

I think that the biggest problem with this movie is that in the original animated Lion King, you can buy those animals talking and singing because they were hand drawn animation and/or cartoons. Cartoons can get away with that stuff, but that just does not work when the characters are photo realistic animals. Looks kind of weird and off-putting. Imagine the Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck “Rabbit Season/Duck Season” routine being played out with a real rabbit and a duck. Just doesn’t work.

I think it would have been better if they went with having none of the animals speak at all. Just let the animals be animals and all of their emotions could be shown through their actions and their facial expressions. In a way, it kind of reminded me of Dinosaur, which would have also benefited if there were no speaking dinosaurs. “Ain’t that right, honey lamb?”, said a brontosaurus never.

Another big problem with this movie is that it is almost an exact copy of the original animated version. And when I say exact copy, I mean it is like some kid in school that sat next to you during a test, cheated, and copied all of your answers off of your paper. You did all of the work, and they reaped the rewards of your hard work.

There is paying tribute to a movie, and then there is outright copying. You just watch the opening Circle Of Life scene. At first, I was like, “Wow, this is pretty cool! It looks just like the original!” But then after a few minutes, I was like, “Wait a minute! They are just tracing over the original animation with computer animation!” The longer it played out, I just found it kind of insulting to the original movie. It looks a hell of a lot more realistic, but the original is one of the most beautiful animated films that Disney ever did.

And there is no doubt about it, This movie is about 90% exactly the same, shot for shot, as the original animated movie, with maybe an additional 10% that was thrown in there that really was not needed. Warning, prepare your eyes to roll to the back of your head during a particular “Beauty and the Beast” scene. Oh, boy.

And the bad thing about it being an inferior shot-for-shot remake is that I did find myself saying several times, “Damn. We are only up this part?” I couldn’t wait to get home so I could watch a good version of this film.

Another problem with this movie is the voice cast. For the most part, they lack any passion. I never thought that I would ever utter these words, but I really miss Jonathan Taylor Thomas as Simba. The kid that voiced Young Simba was not very good. His delivery was not believable and it just felt like he was reading his lines in a recording booth. In fact, everyone felt like they were reading lines in a recording booth.

When I first heard that they were bringing back James Earl Jones to voice Mufasa, I thought that it made no sense. Why bring him back and no one else from the original? It just didn’t sit well with me. But I have to say, by far, he was the best voice actor in the movie. I also thought John Oliver did a really good job as Zazu.

Everyone else was subpar compared to the original voice actors. You sit there and you start to miss Mathew Broderick’s voice as Simba and realize just how good he was. And back then, I thought Broderick was the weakest link. You would think that Donald Glover would have done a much better job voicing Simba, but he was not convincing as at all in this version, and he felt like he was just phoning it in. I also didn’t buy that Young Simba and Older Simba were the same character, if that makes any sense. And Rafiki was boring and not fun at all without Robert Guillaume’s voice. And as for Nathan Lane… you, sir, were sincerely missed!

The songs that we are all familiar with from the original movie are back, but nowhere nearly as good as the originals. There is a new song called “Spirit” that’s performed by Beyonce, and it’s not very memorable and is played oddly during a classic scene, and it just does not work.

But as bad as the songs are, they are nowhere near as bad as the musical score for the film. It has no life to it at all and it sounds at times like elevator music. And where are the drums? I really think the drummer called in sick because there is no pounding beat during key musical ques that made the original movie such a classic experience. It feels like this music was cheaply made on a keyboard with no live instruments.

The original soundtrack, composed and scored by Hans Zimmer, was amazing and made a great movie even better. The music for this film, which unfortunately was also scored by Hans Zimmer, just makes a bad film worse. It’s hard to believe that Hans Zimmer would phone it in. So, who knows? Maybe it was my theater’s garbage sound system.

While this movie is visually impressive, it lacks the heart of the original. I lost count how many times I literally got chills while watching the original animated classic, but it was easy to count how many times I had them this time around. Zero. Even when Mufasa dies. Nothing. This version of The Lion King is just a passionless retelling of a Disney classic, and it just fails at every approach of trying to top, or even just match, the original in every way. Although they do a pretty good job of matching the Circle Of Life scene, but it wouldn’t have killed them to use maybe a few different camera angles. It’s not necessarily bad, and kids will probably love it, but why settle for a lesser version when there is something far more superior that already exists? If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

I give “The Lion King” a 6/10.

About the author

Joe Hogarty

Joe moved from New York to Florida back in 1997. He currently resides in St. Petersburg and visits the parks frequently. His first visit to the Magic Kingdom was when he was 8 years old back in 1974. Joe originally originally started as a photographer for WDWNT and is now the host of WDWNT: Nerd Alert, our movie reviewer and reports the news for WDWNT. You can contact Joe through email at [email protected]

22
Leave a Reply

avatar
13 Comment threads
9 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
19 Comment authors
JessicaAwesome AmyAshriMikeXion Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Kat
Guest
Kat

I think you just saved me twenty bucks. Appreciate it!

Marc
Guest
Marc

Thanks for saving me the trip to the theater. I found it weird that the animals in The Jungle Book remake looked more expressive than the lions in the trailers for this. The fact that it seems to be a shot for shot remake is really disappointing.

fact checker
Guest
fact checker

Wdwnt is the worst source of news and reviews they bash everything Disney because Tom has a grudge again chapek. Real Disney fans love the lion king remake

Tom Corless
Admin
Tom Corless

Many major critics already gave negative reviews.

Caroline
Guest
Caroline

I am a Disney fan to my core, and this movie and the soundtrack stunk. Also, if you think WDWNT is the worst source of news then why are you here reading?

Graham
Guest
Graham

Because he is being paid to comment on posts like these by a reputation management firm. They show up on various critic blogs with usernames like “Fake News Busters” and accuse the author/publisher of some vague impropriety but don’t refute the review/criticism with any real substance.

disney6166
Guest
disney6166

Couldn’t have said it better myself

Xion
Guest
Xion

I’m normally against WDWNT and even I agree with this opinion of theirs.

Lion King remake has looked like shit since day one and as somebody who’s obsessed with Disney and the original, this was just looking to be a disappointment in every sense of the word. If you’re gonna go contrary against them don’t do it on something where they’re actually right. Disney fans should be outraged by this movie. I sure as hell have been from the moment it was announced until now.

Awesome Amy
Guest
Awesome Amy

Heck no they don’t! My daughter – who knows the original LK backwards, forward, and upside down – took her parents (us, awwww), to see this last night, and she was cringing throughout the entire thing. She gave it a 3/10 rating. I feel sorry for kids who see this and will have to live with this as Their” Lion King.

Keith
Guest
Keith

I wonder who had the brilliant idea for the company to scrap all new ideas, and just remake all the old movies…but make them worse? I honestly wonder if it Disney simply caving in to virtue signaling like they seem to be doing at every turn. Real shame….Disney used to make fantastic entertainment!

William
Guest
William

The critics might not like the movie (55% positive rating on Rotten Tomatoes website)… but 90% of the audience that had actually seen the movie (also on Rotten Tomatoes) liked the movie. In the past, I’ve tended to fall more in line with what the “audience” thought vs. what the “critics” thought…

Robert
Guest
Robert

But is this more of a shameless cash grab than re-releasing a movie in theaters only 2 months after it first opened in theaters in the hopes that it would surpass Avatar, with “extra” content at the end that was pure garbage as motivation to see it in theaters again? I don’t think so. The movie was excellent, but they plain admitted that they re-released it to hold the record for #1.

Tom
Guest
Tom

I really enjoyed the movie. I go for entertainment and everyone in the theatre had a great time. Also, true Disney fans have a problem with Chapek.

Antonio Gismundi
Guest
Antonio Gismundi

all that criticism and a 6/10? seems kinda high for all the bashing

Tom Corless
Admin
Tom Corless

I assume it’s a 6 for keeping so much of an already great film.

Randy Wilson
Guest
Randy Wilson

CGI “talking animals” flopped 20 years ago, why bring it back now? It still looks lame. I’m a huge Lion King fan, and will not go see this. It looks lifeless. Disney is known for expressive animations, and everything I’ve seen here looks soulless. Maybe, just maybe, this will be the death knell that sends talking animal CGI back to the grave it rose from,

Awesome Amy
Guest
Awesome Amy

LIFELESS is a great way to describe it! I was missing facial expressions, body language, ANYTHING that would convey emotion during scenes! Like… (spoiler alert really unnecessary here…) when Young Simba and Young Nala were exploring the Elephant Graveyard… there was no body language in the cubs to show that they were scared. They could have been walking around a field of daisies!

Chase
Guest
Chase

I felt the same after it was over. My buddy and I both agreed right after it ended that while visually stunning and I felt I was watching Planet Earth at times, it didn’t get me down deep like the original.

Mike
Guest
Mike

OPENING WEEKEND – Worldwide Gross: $531,000,000.

Ashri
Guest
Ashri

I laughed so hard because I know exactly which beauty and the beast scene was the eye roller! I could not agree more with how horrible that was

Awesome Amy
Guest
Awesome Amy

Awww, I actually kind of liked that part (but then again, I like BatB). I was more loving that they let Pumba say that (and do that)!

Jessica
Guest
Jessica

I couldn’t agree more, and I haven’t even seen it yet! You can hardly call a movie live action when, spoiler, it isn’t. *smh