Third Judge in Disney v. DeSantis Lawsuit Approves Pre-Trial Timeline

Jonathan D

Updated on:

Third Judge in Disney v. DeSantis Lawsuit Approves Pre-Trial Timeline

Judge Allen C. Winsor is set to take over the federal lawsuit Disney has filed against Governor Ron DeSantis and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District leaders, and just today, approved some pre-trial deadlines all parties have agreed to. In the most recent court document to be added to the case, a timeline for the defendants seeking a dismissal of the trial has been set in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida.

  • Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss: Due 6/26/23
  • Plaintiff’s Responses: Due 7/26/23
  • Defendants’ Replies: Due 8/9/23
Judge Mark Walker 1

Yesterday, Judge Mark Walker recused himself from presiding over the proceedings, despite denying Governor DeSantis’ motion to disqualify him. While the Governor claims he was seeking yet another replacement due to perceived and unfounded biases in unrelated cases in which Disney was mentioned, Judge Walker leveled harsh criticisms on the 2024 Presidential candidate’s motion deemed to be “wholly without merit.”

I find the motion is nothing more than rank judge-shopping. Sadly, this practice has become all too common in this district.

Regarding the attempted disqualification over the issue of partiality, Walker stated it would not be approved because the argument against him was “based on a misapprehension of the law and a misstatement of the facts,” with the DeSantis legal team utilizing past comments “for their convenient language without acknowledging the chasm between my statements in this case and the conduct at issue in those cases.” He ultimately decided to step away from the lawsuit after discovering a relative in the third degree owned Walt Disney Company stock.

Even though I believe it is highly unlikely that these proceedings will have a substantial effect on The Walt Disney Company, I choose to err on the side of caution — which, here, is also the side of judicial integrity — and disqualify myself. Maintaining public trust in the judiciary is paramount, perhaps now more than ever in the history of our Republic.

A different arbiter, Martin Fitzpatrick, already recused himself of his own volition in April, citing a “third degree” relation to someone employed by one of the parties. Only time will tell if DeSantis seeks a fourth judge more to his liking, though he may have found the one. The new judge, Winsor, was appointed by former President Donald Trump (as opposed to former President Barack Obama for his predecessor) and has notably protected controversial Florida laws passed by DeSantis, tossing legal opposition away. This would potentially mean he’d act far more favorably and partially to the Governor, being of similar political slant and association.

Outside of this federal proceeding, the defendants are also counter-suing Disney in the Florida courts. Disney has already sought to have that case dismissed. The Board’s 188-page complaint names itself as plaintiff against Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, with district leaders asking the court to render Disney’s development agreement with the former Reedy Creek Improvement District as unenforceable, null, and void. They also ask the same be done of the restrictive covenants, which notably set the benchmark for expiry at 21 years after the death of the last living descendant of King Charles III, still living as of the date of the document.

Ron DeSantis himself is adamant that he will not relent from his incessant pursuit of the company, stating he was “not backing down one inch” at his Presidential campaign kickoff speech in Iowa this week.

We run the state of Florida. They [Disney] do not run the state of Florida. We stand for the protection of our children. We will fight those who seek to rob them of their innocence and on that there will be no compromise.

A History of the Disney-DeSantis Feud

The Florida Governor and Walt Disney Company initially clashed over the corporation’s opposition to a much-debated and controversial Florida law regarding classroom instruction and discussion on sexual orientation and gender identity in public schools, alongside various other recent state laws and proposals in a similar vein.

Bob Chapek speaking into microphone

Bob Chapek was Chief Executive Officer at the time and initially remained silent and passive on the issue — until massive internal criticisms from cast members, the LGBTQ+ community, and controversy over Disney’s practice of making hefty political contributions to campaigns and individuals allegedly against their own stated human principles came into focus.

florida state capitol
Source: Orlando Weekly

In an apparent act of retribution over Chapek’s expression of dissent, the Governor moved forward with various verbal and legal assaults on Disney, including the dissolution of Reedy Creek and eventual transfer of power directly under his control. DeSantis argues he is attacking a rather vague perception of something he calls “woke politics,” invading the state. He further states he aims to put the people of Florida first through his actions:

Disney has gotten away with special deals from the state of Florida for way too long. It took a look under the hood to see what Disney has become to truly understand their inappropriate influence.

Bob Iger 1044198

After heated exchanges and dramatic actions taken by the Governor alleged to be intentionally harmful punishments, The Walt Disney Company sued the Governor and his newly handpicked board not long after Bob Iger’s return as CEO, citing a “targeted campaign of government retaliation — orchestrated at every step by Governor DeSantis as punishment for Disney’s protected speech.” The plaintiff argues that this chronology of events “threatens Disney’s business operations, jeopardizes its economic future in the region, and violates its constitutional rights.”

The Walt Disney Company is suing for “declaratory and injunctive relief.” Injunctive relief forces a party to act in a certain way or prevents them from doing various things. An “injunction” is sometimes known as a restraining order.

Disney regrets that it has come to this, but having exhausted efforts to seek a resolution, the Company is left with no choice but to file this lawsuit to protect its cast members, guests, and local development partners from a relentless campaign to weaponize government power against Disney in retaliation for expressing a political viewpoint unpopular with certain State officials.


DeSantis insists he will double down on efforts to punish the resort through methods both in the Legislature and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight Board. Notably, he promised to raise hotel taxes and institute tolls on the roads around Walt Disney World Resort property, and suggested the idea of building a prison on land directly beside Disney land. Additionally, a bill was passed mandating state inspections of the resort’s monorails.

There’s a lot of little back-and-forths going on now with the state taking control, but rest assured, you know, you ain’t seen nothing yet. There’s more to come in that regard.

recent poll showed Americans are mostly split about whether or not Disney and Governor DeSantis have behaved “appropriately,” but think the court should rule in Disney’s favor.

For the latest Disney Parks news and info, follow WDW News Today on TwitterFacebook, and Instagram.